🔗 Share this article

Loved ones of people buried in graves at risk from coastal erosion state that indecision over how to tackle the issue is causing them avoidable anguish concerning the final resting places of their departed family.

A Looming Danger to Historic Graveyards

The council have singled out three burial grounds in the villages of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being at risk of being consumed by the ocean in the next few generations.

A newly published study on the issue sets out a series of possible actions, from doing nothing to disinterring bodies and reburying them in more secure locations. Authorities say it is for local people to decide how to move forward.

“At the moment we’re in a state of uncertainty. It causes me distress. My parents intended this to serve as their final resting place, but it isn’t going to be because of the encroaching sea.”

Estimates suggest at least a portion of one graveyard could fall into the sea in the next 80 years, but some residents worry it will happen far earlier. “In my view it’s got less than 20 years, if you look at what’s happened in the last 30 years,” one said.

Haunted by the Ghosts of Eccles

One resident remembered a school trip to the nearby settlement of Eccles, which has almost entirely disappeared into the water, including its place of worship and burial ground.

“It was possible to see people’s bones,” she said. “Some have this idealized notion that the deceased will just get washed out to the ocean. That is not the case. Individuals will take bones as mementos and go plundering graves in search of treasures. That is completely disrespectful.”

“I’m worried that the identical fate that befell at Eccles will occur here and there’ll be skeletons on the shore. I would feel appalled by that.”

A Paratrooper's Grave in Peril

Along the coast lies the burial plot of a ex-soldier killed while serving overseas. His mother said she could not sleep after discovering her son’s final plot might one day be relocated.

“It does trouble me to think this won’t be his permanent home,” she said. “To our family it’s an significant place to go.”

She believes, new burials should stop but says it is premature to exhume existing graves. “What I would choose for now is to do nothing and closely monitor, but an early decision must be made when a critical moment has been attained.”

Seeking Solutions and Clarity

The lack of consensus over the timing and method to tackle the problem has resulted in bereaved families feeling frustrated and worried.

Several families want additional sea defences to slow the unavoidable loss and to allow funerals to continue for now. Others contend the time for relocation is drawing near.

“The situation is very emotional,” said one relative. “The official study was thorough, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is implemented. And all parties is washing their hands over who is responsible.”

A local official confirmed the burial sites were owned and managed of the church authorities. “In the end it is up to them to decide the path to take. We are here to assist them through that journey with communities.”

It was also stated there was time to weigh all the choices. “This concerns decades before it starts to be lost.”

“Currently, there exists no common view on what should happen yet. We need good local conversations to discover the right solutions for each village.”

The possibility of losing the churches and graveyards was labeled one of “profound sorrow for the area,” but faith leaders also spoke of a belief in life after death, offering a spiritual perspective on the physical disappearance of hallowed earth.